We The People SC - Latest Comments

Re: Karen Martin Claims Harry Kibler Attacked Conservative Sen. Shane Martin

Magda Aguila — Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:38:54 -0000

She is upset because she attacks someone who is not even mentioned in the original article she uses as the basis for her post?? Perhaps Ms Martin would benefit from "Professional Writing or Reporting 101". As to private emails... if the email was addressed to Harry Kibler, he has every right to make it public if he so chooses. I know he made his email to Shane Martin public as well. There are no dots to be connected. The fact that many South Carolinians, including Harry Kibler support the work of the SCPC, without whom the voters in this State would have no idea about the corruption of our legislators only means that we appreciate the work they are doing, and thank them for it. The problem here is that the SCPC, RINO Hunt, and the RLC have gotten in the way of "business as usual" in South Carolina, and they just don't like it.

Re: Greenville GOP Censures Chad Connelly, Alan Clemmons, and the SCGOP

bill coleman — Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:01:21 -0000

The Republican Party must become more relevant to the people who have died and are willing to die to defend and support the U.S. Constitution. While owning a gun is good and Constitutional, if and when it is time to use a gun, such use will not do what can still be accomplished in the near future thru political and legal means. Three items to consider: (1) 13 states in the hands of tyranny can block any admendment to further the usefulness of the Constitution to save the Constitution and (2) the states (or the people) for all practical purposes have exclusive ownership of the Constitution since (A) the colonies, which became the states, created the federal government and the Constitution as a legal cage to keep the Federal Government from becoming a king or dictatorship, (B) the admendment process requires approval of 2/3 of the House, 2/3 of the Senate and 3/4 of the states and does not require the approval of the POTUS or SCOTUS and does not allow the POTUS or SCOTUS to veto an admendment and (3) the Constitution does not limit the content of any proposed admendment.
The USA has the Constitution if enough states believe and act like it does. Please comment on this if it is wrong or misleading.

Re: Save Our Primary? How About Save Our State!

Zoe Brown — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:50:17 -0000

When the party convention decides who runs we will all be screwed!

Nearly no one knows what to expect going into precinct re-org. The conventions are controlled by committees of barely/rarely professional insiders that think communication is talking to each other. Cheating is a "no-problem" and the party doesn't offer even a slim glimmer of supervision.

Getting information from a party officer takes a 50 requests to different people and either they don't know, wont share, or are actively trying to withhold information from Precinct leaders...particularly those they think may put together some challenge to an officer.

When the party decides by convention who will be on the ticket, the money will flow toward influencing those few people and precinct reorg will see a huge amount of focus. So, it will still be an election!

Stealing the vote from the people will make the Democratic party look a LOT more viable to a LOT more conservative-to-moderate voters AND donors. Bring on the purple state.

In my experience a convention election is a hard game. Cheating, lying, shady dealings and concealed information costs you the price of admission.

Steven Brown is definately practicing the fine art of "hopes and dreams". He seems like such a nice guy, but of course most lawyers and politicians do.